Harm Minimization, Responsible Gambling, and Pre-commitment in Australia: What do Club and Hotel Managers Think?
Abstract
Australian governments are committed to addressing problem gambling and reducing gambling-related harm. In line with responsible gambling ideology, the Victorian government is planning to legislate a system of voluntary, full precommitment into hotels and clubs that operate electronic gaming machines (EGMs, ‘‘pokies’’). Club and hotel managers have first-hand knowledge of gambler behavior and are responsible for implementing the legislated requirements supporting responsible gambling. Therefore, club and hotel managers are perceived to be in a unique position to comment on the effectiveness of government interventions designed to reduce the prevalence of problem gambling and gambling harm. The aim of the current study was to qualitatively investigate harm minimization, responsible gambling, and precommitment as viewed from the perspective of club and hotel managers of venues that have EGMs. The study was ideographic and phenomenological. Results suggest that club and hotel managers acknowledge that problem gambling is an issue for some of their customers, and they are supportive of voluntary forms of precommitment being introduced into their venues. However, they do not believe that the harm-minimization strategies introduced under the Responsible Gambling initiative have been effective in reducing problem gambling and gambling-related harm. These findings are placed within current policy and harm minimization theory with suggestions for moving forward.
References
Alvarez-Moya, E. M., Jimenez-Murcia, S., Moragas, L., Gomez-Pena, M., Aymami, M. N.,...Fernandez-Aranda, F. (2009). Executive functioning among female pathological gambling and bulimia nervosa patients: preliminary findings. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 302-306.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Australian Government Productivity Commission (2010). Productivity Commission Inquiry Report on Gambling, Volume 1 (AGPC Publication No. 50). Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/001
Australian Psychological Society (2010). Report of the APS Working Group on the Psychology of Gambling. Retrieved from http://www.psychology.org.au/ Assets/Files/ The-psychology-of-gambling.pdf
Billieux, J., Lagrange, G., Van der Linden, M., Lancon, C., Adida, M., & Jeanningros, R. (2012). Investigation of impulsivity in a sample of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers: A multidimensional perspective. Psychiatry Research, 198, 291-296.
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487 - 499.
Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2003). Harm minimization in relation to gambling on electronic gaming machines. A submission to the IPART review by members of the Gambling Research Unit at the University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.austgamingcouncil.org.au/elibrary
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Brown, A., & Newby-Clark, I. R. (2005). Self-regulation and problem gambling. Final report submitted to the Ontario problem Gambling Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.gamblingresearch.org/content/research.php?appid=2238
Clubs Australia. (2012). Inquiry into the social and economic costs of problem gambling in Victoria. A submission to the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission. Victoria: Australia. Retrieved from http://www.clubsaustralia.com.au/report/responsible-gambling
Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1997). Lucky events and beliefs in luck: Paradoxical effects on confidence and risk taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 278-388.
Delfabbro, P., Osborn, A., Nevile, M., Skett, I., & McMillen, J. (2007). Identifying problem gamblers in gambling venues: Final report. Report commissioned for the Ministerial Council on Gambling. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Justice, Victoria. (2011). Pre-commitment Discussion Paper. Retrieved from http://www.justice.vic.gov.au/liquor_gambling_racing/gaming/ precommitment
Department of Justice, Victoria (2010). Factors that influence gambler adherence to pre-commitment decisions. Report prepared for Ministerial Council on Gambling. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dickson-Gillespie, L., Rugle, L., Rosenthal, R., & Fong, T. (2008). Preventing the incidence of harm of gambling problems. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 37-55.
Haw, J. (2009). Impulsivity partially mediates the relationship between depression and problem gambling. Gambling Research: Journal of national Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 21, 12-21.
Hing, N. (2004). The efficacy of responsible gambling measures in NSW clubs: The gamblers' perspective. Gambling Research, 16, 32-46.
Korn, D., Gibbons, R., & Azmier, J. (2003). Framing public policy towards a public health paradigm for gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 289-365.
Ladouceur, R., Blaszczynski, A., & Lalande, D. R. (2012). Pre-commitment in gambling: A review of the empirical evidence. International Gambling Studies, 1-16
Livingstone, C., & Woolley, R. (2007). Risky business: A few provocations on the regulation of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 3, 361 - 376.
McQuade, A., & Gill, P. (2012). The role of loneliness and self-control in predicting problem gambling behaviour. Gambling Research: Journal of national Association for Gambling Studies (Australia),24, 18-30.
Neal, P., Delfabbro, P. H., & O'Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Report Commissioned for the Ministerial Council on Problem Gambling. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and pre-commitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 361-372.
Ohtsuka, K. (2013). Views on luck and winning, self-control, and gaming service expectations of culturally and linguistically diverse Australian poker machine gamblers. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3, 1 - 17. Available from http://www.ajgiph.com/content/3/1/9
Ricketts, T., & Macaskill, A. (2003). Gambling as emotion management: Developing a grounded theory of problem gambling. Addiction Research and Theory, 11, 383-400.
Rockloff, M. J., Greer, N., Fay, C., & Evans, L. G. (2011). Gambling on electronic gaming machines is an escape from negative self reflection. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 63-72.
Thomas, A., Moore, S., Kyrios, M., Bates, G., Meredyth, D., & Jessop, G. (2010). Problem gambling vulnerability: The interaction between access, individual cognitions and group beliefs/preferences. Final report prepared for the Victorian Government, Office of Gaming and Racing, Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://justice.vic.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/justlib/doj
Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation (2013). Gambling Expenditure Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.vcglr.vic.gov.au/ gambling_information/ expenditure_and_location/monthly statistics
Wohl, M. J. A., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). The deployment of personal luck: Sympathetic magic and illusory control in games of pure change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1388-1397.
Wohl, M. J. A., & Enzle, M. E. (2003). The effects of near wins and near losses on self-perceived personal luck and subsequent gambling behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 184-191.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I warrant, on behalf of myself and my co-authors, that:
- the article is original, has not been formally published in any other peer-reviewed journal, is not under consideration by any other journal and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights;
- I am/we are the sole author(s) of the article and have full authority to enter into this agreement and in granting rights to the Asia Pacific Association for Gambling Studies(APAGS), are not in breach of any other obligation. If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, I/we will notify APAGS at the time of submission upon which clauses 3 through 4 inclusive do not apply;
- the article contains nothing that is unlawful, libelous, or which would, if published, constitute a breach of contract or of confidence or of commitment given to secrecy;
- I/we have taken due care to ensure the integrity of the article. To my/our - and currently accepted scientific - knowledge all statements contained in it purporting to be facts are true and any formula or instruction contained in the article will not, if followed accurately, cause any injury, illness or damage to the user.
And I agree to the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) agreement, under which all Journal of Gambling and Commercial Gaming Research articles are licensed.